This work evaluates how far x264 can be pushed and what per-title encoding ladders deliver, using FFmpeg/x264 on 13 diverse 1080p clips and VMAF as the quality metric. Incremental tuning - veryslow preset, a 10s GOP, two-pass, extra reference frames - plus switching from a fixed Netflix-style ladder to per-title ladders increased average VMAF by 0.66 points while cutting average bitrate from 4.90 Mbps to 3.27 Mbps (≈33%). Encoding time grew 3.2× on an Intel Core i9-14900 workstation; baseline ladder cost ≈$1.25/hr of content encoded, optimized ≈$3.99/hr, so the extra encoding expense is recovered after about 186 hours of viewing at $0.02/GB bandwidth. Results use a Top-Heavy viewer distribution (≈71.6% on top rungs) and tune top rungs to VMAF≈93 because quality above 93 is visually indistinguishable.
The practical conclusion is clear: implement per-title encoding before assuming gains from HEVC/AV1, since untuned H.264 leaves significant bandwidth on the table. Benefits scale with how inefficient the existing ladder is (big wins if current 1080p top rungs are 5.5-6.5 Mbps) and with clip complexity (news/animation gain more than sports). For mobile-heavy audiences the VMAF gain grows but bandwidth savings shrink, extending the breakeven point, so per-title tuning should be judged against audience profile and encoding throughput.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.