A popular parenting forum was thrown into suspicion after a detailed instruction set for generating one of its signature "am I being unreasonable" responses appeared inside a user thread. The prompt, labelled AIBU Response Schema v.1.0, laid out an "interpersonal reasonableness" template, asked for a clear forum-style ruling and actionable advice, and even defined common site abbreviations such as ND and DD while warning against diagnosing or demeaning neurodivergent people. Members responded with alarm, calling the appearance creepy and disappointing, and some copied the schema into an AI tool and obtained a full reply, which intensified speculation that machine-generated content was replacing human contributors.
Site operators initially denied using AI to write threads, suggesting the text came from a title-suggestion tool that uses an OpenAI model, then later acknowledged a system that sends draft titles to OpenAI had apparently returned a full-reply prompt in error. Leadership emphasised the site does not commission AI-written posts and said AI is deployed only for coding, ad ops, conversational analysis and moderation flagging. The episode exposed tensions over transparency and trust after user numbers and posting fell in 2025 and the organisation signalled it was embedding AI to boost productivity; independent research noting AI-assisted social media can produce generic or less informative content has heightened members' concerns.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.