John Ternus, Greg Joswiak and other high-profile figures are using X as their primary platform, and a large number of interesting people and accounts post there exclusively or far more often than on alternatives. Practical evidence includes Merriam‑Webster’s posting cadence (far heavier on X than on Bluesky this October) and the appearance of new apps and long-form essays that circulate only on X. The platform’s algorithm has been quietly dialed back from the most intrusive Musk-era behavior, so timelines now show mostly chosen follows, tech and sports coverage, and less politics. That shift, plus a generally cheerful, inclusive culture and the presence of “action” - real discussion and discovery rather than filler - is why many users have returned even if they dislike Musk personally.
Threads, Bluesky and Mastodon fail to compete on those grounds: Threads is similar in size but hampered by a weird algorithm and engagement-bait content; Bluesky and Mastodon are smaller, politically charged, and lack the volume of substantive posts. Mastodon remains a low-noise refuge for deliberate browsing, but for people who want lively discovery and important voices, X now delivers. The piece concludes that the platform’s overt “muskiness” has receded, perhaps because Musk stopped micromanaging, and that X is again the central place for timely, interesting social conversation.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.