Commenters debated whether "dumb" coding agents are the models' fault or the harnesses and instructions around them. arjie and brandtcormorant argued that agents only do what they're told and users can build parallel, cooperative setups themselves; Kuyawa and a positive anecdote about DeepSeek said agents can spawn parallel subagents and perform well. mstank and polyterative praised recent models like Opus 5.5 and Astra for better multitasking, while ilamont criticized agents for never delegating to cheaper or smarter models mid-task. wrs shared an anecdote of an agent reading its own minified source, and asdff quipped about "distillation" by asking for source code.
Opinions diverged on who should fix the problem and how. kgeist described a real-world server overload from QwenCode launching many parallel subagents and said harness defaults matter; imimayj1337 argued harness tooling has stagnated. cbrake recommended doc-driven development to align expectations, while TeMPOraL advised trusting the best available model until quota forces a downgrade - questioning vendor motives and descriptions. Overall, commenters split between responsibility resting with users to craft better harnesses, with vendors to provide sensible defaults and transparency, or with model designers to enable smarter delegation.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.