Commenters read the state-by-state figures as a comparison of revenue sources, not the amount of money states collect. They noted New Hampshire’s reliance on property taxes, Oregon’s relatively large income-tax share, and high sales-tax shares in Washington, Tennessee, and Arizona. Delaware’s license-tax share prompted speculation that company incorporations explain it, while one commenter guessed that “other” revenue may include resource extraction. Several wanted the figures shown in dollars or per capita, and another argued that federal funding should be included to show how it is distributed. A reply said the chart’s proportional view was the point.
The figures also sparked debate about tax policy. One commenter proposed that states tax data centers’ use of local resources, as Alaska taxes oil and gas extraction, potentially using the revenue to support residents and cushion AI-related disruption. Property taxes drew disagreement: some called them wealth taxes, while others said taxes based on a home’s assessed value ignore its owner’s equity and differ from taxes on income-producing assets; commenters also noted that landlords may pass costs on to tenants. People disagreed over corporate income tax as well: one characterized it as a tax on payroll, while another distinguished it from individual income-tax withholding. An Oregon commenter questioned why high taxes coexist with poor infrastructure, healthcare, and education.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.