hn.today

Whatever Happened to Fire Escapes

practical.engineering184 points143 comments
Screenshot of Whatever Happened to Fire Escapes

Cities bolted external metal stairs and balconies to older buildings in the late 1800s because catastrophic fires and cheap retrofit economics made a bolt-on escape the only practical way to meet new laws. An 1860 New York bakery fire prompted a retroactive requirement for a fireproof stair or an exterior escape, and inventors proposed everything from rope ladders to a “parachute hat” before the iron ladder-and-balcony system became the common solution around 1900. Building codes emerged to balance cost against safety, so fire escapes spread where interior reconfiguration was too expensive or impossible, especially in dense tenements and factories.

Technical reviews and disasters exposed the limits of that approach. An 1881 Franklin Institute study downplayed the value of external egress, and the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist fire - where an exterior escape buckled and more than 140 people died - crystallized criticism that these devices could worsen panic exits. Regulators split between banning them and improving standards; the 1949 code imposed minimum sizes, but practical problems remained: façade clutter, burglary access, corrosion and maintenance, hinged bottom ladders failing, and tenants blocking balconies. By the late 1960s many cities prohibited new exterior exits and adopted enclosed, incombustible stairways with self-closing doors - stairwells used daily and kept clear proved a far more reliable means of escape.

Read on practical.engineering143 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Security

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.