Commenters debated why the Snowden archive’s impact faded, with many saying the revelations were absorbed into public life and the Overton window shifted. Some (rtpg, phendrenad2) recommended rereading the original reporting for detailed context, while others (firesteelrain, pluc) argued people grew ambivalent as leaks trickled out and attention moved on to other scandals. Several commenters (BLKNSLVR, iamnothere) suggested a chilling effect from the Assange case and reprisals that pushed journalists and sources away from further disclosures. A few noted concrete outcomes - like a push for HTTPS everywhere (commandersaki) - but argued overall outrage didn’t translate into sustained action (phendrenad2, pluc).
Opinion split sharply over Snowden’s situation and legacy. Some commenters (unsungNovelty, anonym29, VCFundedGenYer) insisted he was stranded when his passport was revoked rather than having “fled” to Russia, while others (firesteelrain) called his move a choice to seek asylum and avoid prosecution. Debate continued over whether Snowden destroyed remaining copies or retained leverage (BLKNSLVR, motionlessveloc). Additional strands raised distrust of democratic oversight of intelligence (totetsu, markdown), disappointment about unreleased WikiLeaks or Epstein materials (WarOnPrivacy, joe_the_user), and frustration that systemic abuses remain largely unaddressed (dinfinity, iamnothere).
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.