hn.today

Washing machines took decades to catch on

daily.jstor.org51 points73 comments
Screenshot of Washing machines took decades to catch on

Electric washing machines entered American homes in the 1910s, but their promise of easier housework did not quickly translate into mass adoption. Unlike electric refrigerators and vacuum cleaners, they lacked obvious status or entertainment appeal, and many households could not afford them. Social expectations also shaped demand: in the South, white families commonly paid Black laundresses to do the heavy work, rooted in low-cost Black labor and conventions inherited from slavery that treated manual labor as beneath white women. Maytag largely abandoned Southern sales during the first half of the 1930s, while some manufacturers used openly racist appeals to discourage reliance on Black laundresses.

Manufacturers pursued door-to-door, high-pressure selling, first targeting working-class families and then, as the Depression weakened that market, white-collar households trying to preserve middle-class standards of cleanliness. But home machines faced strong competition from commercial laundries, which did far more business in 1928 than residential electric washers. Early semiautomatic models also demanded substantial effort: users had to feed clothes through wringers between stages, and separate rinse tubs required considerable space. Maytag’s emphasis on legal control and patents over research and development also became vulnerable after a 1939 Supreme Court ruling invalidated its patent claims. Home washing machines finally prevailed in the postwar boom, when fully automatic models could wash, rinse, spin, and drain without supervision. Self-service laundries also made machine washing available to people lacking money or room for an appliance.

Read on daily.jstor.org73 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Culture

Defund Elon Musk

Defund Elon Musk

Robert Reich argues that Elon Musk’s control of Starlink gave him undue influence over US foreign policy after he reportedly slowed Ukraine’s military-grade service. He urges people to stop buying Musk’s products and calls for taxing billionaires, limiting their political and media power, and reducing government reliance on their companies. (theguardian.com)

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.