A comparison of 3,000 parallel sentences across English, Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and Finnish found that all twelve tested frontier AI models used more tokens for the Nordic languages than for English. Across models, Swedish cost 29-68% more on news and 32-68% more on encyclopedic text; Norwegian and Danish premiums were similarly large, while Finnish cost 54-100% more. Because models bill by token and generate one token at a time, these differences raise both usage costs and response times. The study used two public translation datasets and compared token counts for equivalent content, reporting premiums relative to English.
The extra cost comes mainly from tokenizers, which split text into pieces based on vocabularies shaped by training data: common English words are often single tokens, while less-represented Nordic words get split into several. Swedish and Norwegian translations were virtually the same length as English, so wordiness does not explain their premium. A tokenizer designed for Nordic text, used by the open Viking model, reduced the premium to about 5% for Swedish, Norwegian, and Finnish and 7% for Danish. Newer, larger vocabularies have narrowed the gap, but many leading models still rely on vocabularies that underrepresent Nordic text. The findings support investment in local AI labs and language-specific models, which could improve cost efficiency without sacrificing capability.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.