A large portion of Jezebel’s archive suddenly became inaccessible, including reporting and commentary on rape, abortion, politics, and pop culture. Former staffers found years of work missing; one circulating list named about 1,000 removed stories from Jezebel and its sister site Splinter, while the Washington Post initially reported a smaller figure. The writer found roughly 49 of her own pieces on the list, including investigative work and lighter stories, suggesting the removals were not limited to sensitive subjects. People familiar with Paste, which owns the sites, said publisher William Sagan had ordered deletions after an advertising company flagged headlines as unsuitable for brands. Sagan disputed that account, saying stories had not been deleted but sometimes moved to drafts for review or corrections, and maintained that Jezebel’s editorial policy had not changed.
Some missing stories returned the next day, but many lacked images and bylines; others remained offline. The episode raises concerns about publishers’ power to erase or obscure online work, the fragility of digital archives, and the effects on writers’ ability to be credited and found. It also unfolds as Jezebel’s staff and resources have dwindled since Paste bought it in 2023, with the site lacking an editor-in-chief. Former staffers argue that preserving the archive matters as journalism and cultural history, and that the publication may need new ownership and a different business model to survive.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.