hn.today

The future of programming – A.I. Wasserman and S. Gutz (1982)

dl.acm.org56 points14 comments
Screenshot of The future of programming – A.I. Wasserman and S. Gutz (1982)

Commenters weighed the 1982 paper’s predictions about “automatic programming,” improved tools, and a shift toward nonprocedural specifications against today’s AI-assisted coding. Several argued the authors were prescient about short-term productivity gains from better IDEs and spec-driven work, and that modern LLMs like Claude function as the “improved tools” the paper anticipated. Others pointed out persistent realities the paper noted - debugging still often forces programmers to relate high-level code to machine instructions, and no-code or visual programming repeatedly fails to gain broad traction. Some framed current advances as a reprise of earlier movements (4GLs, Japan’s Fifth Generation), suggesting historical analogues even if past efforts didn’t stick.

Opinion divides on whether people in the 1980s could have imagined today’s LLMs and their social shape. A few commenters recalled sci‑fi and academic visions of sentient, self-programming machines but said those imagined centralized, sovereign AIs unlike today’s ubiquitous, low-cost inference services. Others emphasized that current systems are better seen as massive search and pattern-match engines than original problem-solving intelligences, and noted varied personal experiences: some were once warned AI would erase computing careers, while others pointed out careers flourished until recent leaps made the paper’s long-term scenario suddenly closer.

Read on dl.acm.org14 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in AI

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.