hn.today

Testing Jev for IAM Access Decisions

trustle.com9 points3 comments
Screenshot of Testing Jev for IAM Access Decisions

Trustle tested Jev, a fast, low-cost decision model, for choosing least-privilege IAM roles and assessing access risk. Unlike a conventional language model that generates text, Jev answers typed questions from a fixed set of options and supplies probabilities that can support confidence thresholds. In a secret-access example, it selected the three-permission role needed to read a secret, with 0.99 confidence, while Trustle’s existing search ranking favored a role with 2,563 permissions. Risk-scoring experiments showed that broad questions produced uninformative results, while focused questions combined in code worked better. After refining the inputs and fitting weights against an independent reference, agreement rose from 0.75 to 0.86 on held-out roles.

In tests of 66 access requests, Jev alone reached 91.4% accuracy, compared with Gemini’s 98.0%; a hybrid that used Jev when confident and sent uncertain cases to Gemini reached 98.5%. Jev selected an over-broad role in 1.5% of cases, responded in about 0.1 seconds, and cost roughly $0.10 per 1,000 decisions. The hybrid cut Gemini requests by more than half while preserving accuracy; a 0.9 confidence threshold also scored 97.9% on held-out cases. Jev struggled with indirect privilege escalation, counting permissions, multi-role requests, and tasks better handled by rules. Its effectiveness depended on precise, narrow questions and well-chosen response options.

Read on trustle.com3 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in AI

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.