The dispute centers on GrapheneOS’s claim that it is the target of a smear campaign, alongside tension between its developers and Murena, associated with /e/OS. Some commenters see privacy-focused operating systems as allies and urge the groups to stop attacking one another; an /e/OS user says the system delivers security updates reliably. Others argue that criticism of privacy tools should not be taken as an attack on GrapheneOS itself, since people who value privacy and criminals may use the same tools. One commenter goes further, portraying GrapheneOS as a big-money project with an unclear team and asking users to trust its assurances about banks, app compatibility, and Google traffic.
Commenters divide over claims that law enforcement is promoting less-secure devices to expose users. One sees a multinational police operation and warns that activists, reproductive-rights advocates, Palestinians, and LGBT people could be targets; another says the claim lacks evidence and wants journalists to investigate. Several commenters defend privacy as a basic right, arguing that state surveillance threatens people beyond the criminal groups it is ostensibly aimed at. Others criticize the presentation: Mastodon’s post limits and layout make the case look reactive or conspiratorial, they say, and a blog post or reported article would communicate it more credibly.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.