Curious Hacker News is an unofficial, experimental mirror intended to make Hacker News discussions more curious and less snarky. It runs comments through Claude, which decides whether to preserve, rewrite, or remove them using Hacker News guidelines and additional prompt tuning. Rewritten comments appear under pseudonyms rather than their original authors’ names, to avoid implying that those people wrote the AI-edited text. The site says its purpose is not to discard every sharp-edged comment: it aims to retain useful insight while reducing sarcasm, personal accusations, and low-effort meta commentary. The original comments can be compared with the edited versions, and the project makes clear that rewritten text is AI-generated.
A demonstration based on a thread about AI and technical debt shows the system’s judgments in practice. Of five displayed comments from a 403-comment discussion, none was kept unchanged: two were rewritten and three removed. One rewrite strips sarcastic claims and an accusation that an organization is promoting AI, while retaining the commenter’s factual point that AI finds only a small share of vulnerabilities. Another preserves a software worker’s first-hand account - that more than half of a product’s validated vulnerability reports arrived in the past year and that AI supplied correct fixes for 80 percent - while deleting an opening jab. The removed comments are described as consisting mainly of shilling accusations, complaints about other accounts, or claims that someone is a bot. The example reveals both the project’s aim and its editorial power: an AI system decides which contributions count as constructive and how they are reframed.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.