A 24-year-old Sri Lankan migrant worker, Anojan Sivarasa, faces execution in Saudi Arabia after an appellate court found him guilty of blasphemy for a Tamil comment about the Prophet Muhammad made during a heated social-media exchange. The dispute began after video of a Muslim man kicking a dog at a Hindu pilgrimage circulated online; in the ensuing exchanges Anojan posted an insulting remark, then deleted it and issued an apology video. Screenshots reached his Saudi employer and authorities, leading to his arrest in July, seizure of his devices and deletion of his accounts. Al-Ahsa Criminal Court initially sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment and a 3 million riyal fine; on 17 September prosecutors successfully asked that he be tried under Sharia rather than cybercrime laws, and the appellate court upgraded the punishment to death. Family contact has been cut off since 28 September.
The case has triggered nationwide concern in Sri Lanka, with cross-religious leaders, political parties and the president urging clemency and coordinating diplomacy. A four-member legal delegation is travelling to Saudi Arabia to meet local defence lawyers; two Saudi firms are handling the case. Human-rights groups warn that severe penalties for online speech, the vulnerability of low-wage migrant workers, language barriers and opaque Saudi practices - including executions carried out without prior family or embassy notice - raise urgent protection concerns.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.