hn.today

Running local LLMs on your Mac: what fits, what's free, and what's overkill

typetab.app11 points8 comments
Screenshot of Running local LLMs on your Mac: what fits, what's free, and what's overkill

This explains how virtually any Apple Silicon Mac can run useful language models locally, why Macs are especially well-suited (unified memory, Neural Engine, MLX), and which model sizes fit which machines. Concrete footprints are given for 4-bit quantized models: 1-3B ≈1-2GB (any Mac), 7-8B ≈4-5GB (8GB+), 14B ≈9GB (16GB+), 30B ≈18-20GB (32GB+), and 70B ≈40GB+ (64GB+). Two practical rules are emphasized: leave RAM headroom for other apps, and prefer a tuned smaller model over a generic larger one for focused tasks. The piece points to two free, mature runtimes - Ollama (CLI) and LM Studio (GUI) - as the easiest ways to run open models locally.

The central argument is that local models aren’t replacements for frontier cloud models on hard reasoning or long-form research, but they excel at latency, privacy, cost, and reliability for daily work. The most productive use isn’t a chat window but embedding small, fine-tuned models into everyday tools: local transcription, private file search, and especially on-device autocomplete that learns your writing. The recommended setup is a hybrid workflow - pay for cloud access for the hardest 5% of tasks and run local models for the constant 95% of typing, with on-device fine-tuning required for truly personal assistants like TypeTab’s 1B autocomplete model.

Read on typetab.app8 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in AI

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.