An experienced interviewer outlines a repeatable closing move: explicitly shift the interview into “feedback mode” and deliver concise, candid, capability-focused feedback before leaving the room. The feedback mixes specific praise (clear architecture walkthroughs, strong examples of creating psychological safety, demonstrated topic knowledge) with concrete concerns (surface-level answers that don’t show how to actually build or uplift a team, gaps in testing depth, worries that a candidate’s seniority could affect retention). The practice emphasizes actionable observations about what a candidate can do, not vague judgments about personality, and invites other interviewers to contribute so the candidate hears a synthesized view rather than a one-way verdict.
Responses fall into predictable categories: grateful acceptance, clarifying corrections that resolve misunderstandings and change the interviewer’s view, attempts to correct that only confirm weaknesses, and very rare negative reactions - usually triggered when feedback targets personality rather than observable behavior. Giving real-time feedback improves transparency, gives candidates useful takeaways, and can surface information that strengthens hiring decisions. Although described from a tech-hiring perspective, the core recommendation - to form and share provisional opinions immediately and let candidates respond - is presented as broadly applicable and worth trying in most interview contexts.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.