hn.today

Programmable pigments: Photochromic nanoparticle inks for rewritable tattoos

cell.com59 points38 comments
Screenshot of Programmable pigments: Photochromic nanoparticle inks for rewritable tattoos

Commenters reacted with excitement about photochromic nanoparticle inks and curiosity about technical possibilities. qwertytyyuu speculated about printing images with a UV laser and kreelman wondered if the material could act like e-ink; teucris expanded that idea toward bistable displays. phyzome and others called the concept "dope," while Retr0id warned that everyday daylight causing reversion would be annoying. Robdel12 flagged the use of PMMA as introducing "nano plastics" into the skin, and sleepyguy cautioned about immune reactions; yahthatsart corrected the terminology and noted that immune-system effects on tattoos are complex, not simply harmful.

Commenters also debated practical and social implications. riffraff and computerfriend said concealing tattoos is better solved with makeup or bandages, while landgenoot feared corporate human advertising and Bluestein imagined monetizing body space. Razengan proposed invisible AR markers as a less invasive alternative. Others suggested niche uses - jogu for magic tricks, duggan for targeting markets like Japan where Karrot_Kream noted hot-spring bans, and accountrequired pitched a movie premise. Reactions mixed technical enthusiasm with concerns about usability, health, and cultural consequences.

Read on cell.com38 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Science

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.