The discussion centered on the recent removal of Russian-linked bots and the wider role of bots and content farms on social platforms. Several commenters argued that platforms are complicit because they financially depend on traffic-driven ad revenue, with offshore content farms in places like China, India and the Philippines creating posts, likes and shares to arbitrage ad networks (legitster, jazzyjackson). Others offered mixed views on specific services: one commenter praised Yandex for enabling uncensored search while also accusing it of supporting the Russian military (mmh0000). Some observers said the moderation change produced noticeably quieter comment sections and fewer antagonistic posts (sleepyguy), and one hoped for investigative follow-ups (youniverse).
Opinion divided sharply over what those changes mean. A few claimed movements like BLM have nearly vanished from social media since the removals (throwawayfifo), while others challenged that and pointed to long-term tails or confirmation bias (FireBeyond, Gander5739). Several voices framed the issue as one of engagement economics, suggesting the platforms’ true customers are advertisers and bot networks rather than human users (jazzyjackson, jacquesm). One commenter asked whether paid subscribers count as a third, meaningful customer, implying debate over how much premium revenue can counter ad- and bot-driven incentives (dpoloncsak).
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.