Voters are increasingly turning to AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini to research ballots and even decide votes in the 2026 midterms. People use them to enumerate races on their ballots, produce comparative tables for down-ballot contests, verify viral claims and build voter tools like Ballot Lookup. NPR profiles several users - Adam Johnson in West Virginia used ChatGPT for hours to match candidates to his priorities, Lisa Veldran used Gemini to compare gubernatorial hopefuls, and Lakshmi Iyer used Claude to assemble a nonpartisan lookup site - while Pew Research finds about half of American adults use AI chatbots and 42% use them for information searches. AI companies point to election safeguards; some firms did not respond to requests for comment.
Experts and users flag specific risks alongside convenience. Rafael Batista of Johns Hopkins warns models are agreeable and subtly persuasive, reinforcing preexisting leanings; commercial models’ opaque training and source selection hide possible biases. Chatbots also hallucinate, so some users cross-check answers across models, hide personal cues in prompts or run queries in incognito mode. The decline of local news amplifies reliance on these tools, and while many users report feeling prepared to vote after AI-assisted research, the technology’s sycophantic tendencies and unverifiable sourcing leave open questions about how informed those choices really are.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.