Passkeys are promoted as a more secure and convenient replacement for passwords, but they remove ultimate user control and are deliberately confusing. The standard originates from the FIDO Alliance, a consortium dominated by corporate, government, and institutional interests with no consumer-advocacy presence. Unlike passwords or TOTP authenticator codes - both intuitive, user-controllable, and based on open standards - passkeys are a family of mutually incompatible options (copyable vs non-copyable, transferable vs non-transferable, hardware-backed vs software-backed, attested vs unattested). Those options let websites and platform vendors choose behaviors that lock users in, prevent sharing or recovery, and silently change what a “passkey” actually does. The naming conflates very different technical objects so users will not notice trade-offs when they switch.
The essential specifics: non-copyable passkeys can still be transferable; hardware-backed passkeys live inside secure chips and cannot be exported; software-backed passkeys can be files you control. WebAuthn’s many optional features give sites a “hidden dial” to restrict copying, backup, or migration, enabling gradual erosion of user autonomy (for example, preventing account rescue or forcing vendor-specific recovery). The conclusion is categorical: do not adopt passkeys if retaining control, backupability, and straightforward sharing are priorities.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.