Meta introduces Muse Ember as its smallest, most efficient model, aimed at the repeated, structured work performed by AI agents: tool use, workflow automation, coding subtasks, routing, information extraction, and lengthy document analysis. It supports text, images, audio, and video, and can interpret screenshots, charts, scanned files, recordings, and video without a separate model. Its context window is one million tokens, with outputs up to 512,000 tokens, allowing it to process large codebases or document collections in one call. Meta positions Ember as a high-throughput counterpart to its Muse Wonder model, which handles harder planning while Ember takes on volume.
Benchmark results generally favor Ember over Claude Haiku 5.5 and GPT-6 Luna on agent and coding tasks, though not every test. Ember scores 37.8% on AutomationBench-AA, versus 20.2% and 13.9%, and leads on Agents’ Last Exam, a personal-work composite, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and Coding Agent Index-AA. Haiku scores higher on FrontierCode 2.0-AA, while Ember and Luna tie on GDP.pdf; the Artificial Analysis Index also shows Ember and Haiku tied at their best settings. Meta’s cost comparison says Ember matches Haiku’s top score for roughly one-third the expense and beats Luna’s tested settings. It is available through the Meta Model API for $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens. Early enterprise testers emphasize speed, token efficiency, and usefulness for document review, coding, and multi-repository investigations.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.