hn.today

Iranian campaign planted fake articles in real U.S. publications using ChatGPT

washingtonpost.com170 points154 comments
Screenshot of Iranian campaign planted fake articles in real U.S. publications using ChatGPT

Commenters focused on an Iranian influence campaign that used ChatGPT to generate opinion pieces and slip them into U.S. outlets, with many arguing the emphasis should be on the operators rather than the tool (thih9). Some warned that centralized LLM services introduce new risks - logging, judgment, and reporting of users (chvid) - and others noted AI dramatically lowers the cost and scale of old propaganda tactics (estearum). Several commenters put the episode in historical context, saying state and PR manipulation of media is longstanding (tastyfreeze, jillesvangurp, glenngillen, SoftTalker). Practical concerns ranged from a reader’s confusion about how polished submissions get published (card_zero, baby) to fears about AI hallucinations and trust (tyjen) and the risk of foreign training-data poisoning (capitainenemo). Proposals for mitigation included stronger verification, domain/person reputation, and digital signatures (jillesvangurp).

Opinion split sharply on seriousness and remedy. Some argued the pieces were legitimate anti-war arguments rather than propaganda (gavinray, supjeff) and that identifying AI-origin content serves a social purpose (JoBrad). Others called it classic FUD or routine PR manipulation (bitmasher9, SoftTalker), warned against censorship (axus), or counseled stronger media literacy and skepticism of all outlets (gustavus, everdrive). Views diverged between technical fixes, regulatory action, and simply treating all media as adversarial.

Read on washingtonpost.com154 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Security

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.