hn.today

ICE's Lies About a Man Officer Ran over Undone by Footage from CCTV Camera

techdirt.com68 points10 comments
Screenshot of ICE's Lies About a Man Officer Ran over Undone by Footage from CCTV Camera

mainecoder framed the core question around whether the driver’s actions - caught on nearby CCTV - amount to attempted second-degree murder, noting the car appeared to turn intentionally toward the person and arguing a vehicle can be a deadly weapon. Terr_ responded with legal caution, saying state law varies and that proving intent to kill for second-degree murder is difficult, while involuntary manslaughter or reckless homicide might be easier to prove; ShowalkKama and butvacuum2 pushed back in different ways, with ShowalkKama saying they’d consider the driver guilty and butvacuum2 arguing that a reasonable person would foresee death from running someone over, which can satisfy intent. lux-lux-lux and mandeepj highlighted a split over accountability: lux-lux-lux cynically suggested officers get different treatment, while mandeepj reminded readers that officers do sometimes go to jail.

Other commenters focused on ICE’s conduct and credibility. Soganess framed the episode as a deliberate PR play or “psyop,” and FireBeyond accused ICE of repositioning the victim’s vehicle to support its narrative. verdverm questioned ICE’s authority to make traffic stops, and some warned of predictable defenders who call such errors acceptable collateral for enforcing immigration law. The discussion divides between those who see the footage as proof of a deliberate, criminal act and those urging legal technicalities, institutional immunity, or competing explanations for what the footage shows.

Read on techdirt.com10 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Security

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.