hn.today

Gemini 4 Argon

deepmind.google1192 points844 comments
Screenshot of Gemini 4 Argon

Commenters debated Gemini 4 Argon’s capabilities and benchmarks, with several praising its language quality and multimodal strengths. Simonw highlighted Google’s SVG training and excellent “pelican” outputs, postalcoder and protoman3000 said its prose and style stand out, and jjcm and mridulmalpani pointed to competitive image->HTML and Pareto-frontier results. Others like freakynit were intrigued by bold claims (video→physics-accurate simulation) and d2kx described using Argon for niche research tasks. A few noted concrete wins in coding and new language features (npn) while jjcm ranked it near current SOTA for particular web-rendering tasks.

Where opinion divides most is rollout, pricing and reliability. Many commenters (I_am_tiberius, mistic92, tireonfire, efficax, bezko) reported access problems, confusing product choices (Kuyawa) and payment failures; tekacs and others countered that Pro/Ultra access is gated but imminent. Damsta, a11r and Trusteando criticized opaque introductory pricing and questioned future token costs, while Insanity and rcr-anti warned about Google pushing internal usage and marketing claims. Skeptics (amai, eyalitki, arjie, redox99) flagged hallucinations, math errors and being behind Opus/Astra despite some praise, so readers split between enthusiasm for Argon’s capabilities and frustration with Google’s launch, access and pricing decisions.

Read on deepmind.google844 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in AI

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.