The writer reacts angrily to Sam Altman’s claim that computer memory is being wasted in personal computers and would be better deployed in data centres. They interpret the proposal not as a neutral efficiency argument but as a push to make people rent computing capacity from companies such as Altman’s. In that arrangement, the provider could decide who gets access, set prices, restrict what the computers can do, and potentially control users’ work and data. The writer sees this concentration of computing power as a route to broader social influence.
The piece also attacks the authority granted to wealthy technology founders and the way news outlets entertain their claims as serious expertise. The writer argues that success in building and selling technology does not make these executives deeply knowledgeable or trustworthy, and portrays them as detached from ordinary people, whose welfare they disregard. It rejects the idea that their projects necessarily improve human life, linking their indifference to the prospect of climate disaster. The conclusion is a fierce personal denunciation of Altman, his data centres, and AI, including a wish that he suffer. Its argument is driven by anger and distrust rather than evidence about the technical merits of the memory proposal.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.