Apple's Smart Home Push Includes Doorbell, Lock, Thermostat Codeveloped with LG

Commenters focused on Apple's new smart‑home hardware and the fact it was co‑developed with LG, with many expressing distrust of LG based on past privacy scandals and perceived poor product quality. Several wrote that merely seeing LG's name "soured" the offering, warning that buyers would be beta testers for unreliable devices and fearful of data snooping; one suggested simply keeping LG devices off the internet. Another commenter offered a cynical view that Apple's privacy posture exists because it increases value and could be compromised for profit. Some questioned whether Apple would let LG write actual software for Apple‑branded products, while another lamented brand dilution.

Others highlighted practical experiences and technical concerns rather than vendor identity. A number of commenters said smart‑home gear is convenient for remote access, vacation access, and automated temperature control, while different voices reported HomeKit instability and Siri limitations that undermine usability. Several noted geographic differences in adoption, saying many people they know use these systems, whereas others never encountered them. One participant invoked an older co‑branding example (Motorola ROKR) to suggest such partnerships have precedents. The split was mainly between privacy/quality skeptics and users emphasizing real‑world convenience despite platform faults.