hn.today

Altman: `World should accept some bad things happening' for the benefits of AI

politico.com8 points11 comments
Screenshot of Altman: `World should accept some bad things happening' for the benefits of AI

Commenters debated Sam Altman’s claim that society should accept some harms for AI’s benefits, with several warning that this echoes the Industrial Revolution and could be catastrophic. proc0 warned of AI creating a bottleneck that leaves “billions of useless humans,” causing poverty, unrest, and war, and criticized corporate hubris. akagusu echoed that concern while supernes mockingly suggested Altman is willing to accept deaths. v7engine framed the outcome as richer rich and poorer poor, reflecting worries about concentrated gains and systemic risk from unchecked deployment.

Others argued about whether public sentiment actually backs Altman’s stance. N_Lens asserted most people would accept personal gain at others’ expense and tied that to free‑market capitalism and “might makes right,” while MiroslavPokorny and popalchemist pushed back: MiroslavPokorny questioned whether most people even understand AI, and popalchemist called Altman an extreme edge case rather than a normative example. lf88 cited polls indicating a majority favor slowing AI. The economic-framing was contested too: MiroslavPokorny claimed no real alternative to capitalism exists today, and JohnFen corrected that capitalism is specifically about ownership of the means of production rather than trade itself.

Read on politico.com11 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Other

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.