hn.today

AI Safety Is Mostly a Sex Cult

bsky.app60 points31 comments
Screenshot of AI Safety Is Mostly a Sex Cult

Commenters debated a provocative claim that the AI-safety/rationalist scene is "mostly a sex cult." Delichon pushed back that attacking origins (fan fiction, polycules) is ad hominem and irrelevant to an author's technical judgment. Hax0ron3 agreed there are cult-like vibes around figures like Yudkowsky but said calling it a "sex cult" goes too far without evidence of coercion; they and others noted polyamory, communal living and unconventional sexual norms don't equal exploitation. An0malous described modern rationalism as quasi-religious, arguing belief in ASI functions like faith and invites post-hoc rationalization, while miladyincontrol warned some rhetoric echoes exclusionary "race realist" framings repurposed for software. Tim333 emphasized AI safety need not be conflated with Yudkowsky's eccentricities.

Opinion split on behavioral specifics, intellectual pedigree, and platform moderation. Olalonde and hax0ron3 quarreled over whether frequent crying or infrequent showering indicates pathology, and mushi_shi and others flagged hubris and insularity as greater problems than sex lives. Rpcope1 lamented missing Bayesian intellectual roots (Jaynes) in the community. Piloto_ciego and verdverm raised concerns about HN flagging and coordinated influence, while Hizonner and others criticized confident statistical claims about the group's makeup. Overall the conversation divided between critics who see dangerous cult-like belief structures or bad epistemics, and defenders who call out ad hominem dismissal and lack of hard evidence.

Read on bsky.app31 comments on Hacker News

Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.

More in Culture

The daily digest

Today's best Hacker News stories, summarized and screenshotted, one email a day.