Weight-space programming uses a language model to inspect and directly modify another model’s weights, without training or gradients. Beaker, an autonomous agent improver, tested whether it could discover useful edits to Qwen3.5-0.8B, whose accuracy on MATH-500 was about 7% and whose answers often looped until they hit the token limit. In a run where Beaker could not execute the model, it identified a single neuron in layer 22 and doubled its output. The change made the token “Wait” less likely when the model was stuck in repetitive reasoning, raising accuracy to 37.4%. A more complex edit found with GPT-6 Astra reached 38.6%; allowing Beaker to inspect activations and token probabilities produced results between 34.8% and 39.5%.
Combining edits from several Beaker runs raised accuracy to 43.0%, chiefly by reducing answers cut off at the token limit. Adding Beaker’s neuron edit to the broader change from Takehi and colleagues - 64 output columns modified across two layers - reached 58.8%, compared with 51.1% for that edit alone. The experiments suggest that a small, targeted change can complement larger edits by addressing a different failure mode. A cheaper model, GPT-6.1 Sol, found the same key neuron and performed similarly at a fraction of the cost. Beaker could also make answers shorter, but failed to teach the model to say “I don’t know”; the results demonstrate promising but limited behavior changes on one small model and math benchmark.
Summary generated by AI from the linked article. hn.today is not affiliated with Hacker News or Y Combinator.